Small LM Post-Training for AI Call Agents
ScamAI · 2026
Synthetic training data and one LoRA recipe for six small LMs that answer calls.
Problem
A call-screening agent must reply within its owner's authority during a call and summarize the call afterward. Small on-device models do both poorly, and real calls come with no reference replies or summaries to train on.
My contribution
- Built the data pipeline that produced 3,395 synthetic calls and 15,102 training targets (11,707 replies, 3,395 summaries).
- Fine-tuned six 0.6–4B models (Qwen3, Llama 3.2, Gemma 3), one rank-16 LoRA adapter per model for both tasks.
- Evaluated 4,608 outputs on 192 held-out calls with a custom five-criterion LLM rubric.
Approach
Gate Dialogue review and summary review: a call is kept only if both accept it
3,395 calls
11,707 reply targets
3,395 summary targets
Train One rank-16 LoRA adapter per model, both tasks sampled equally, loss on target tokens only; six 0.6–4B models (Qwen3, Llama 3.2, Gemma 3)
Evaluate Released vs. adapted checkpoint on 192 held-out calls: 4,608 outputs
Results
- 93.75–96.88% reply qualification after training, up from 20.83–53.65% (range over six models)
- 43.23–72.40% summary qualification after training, up from 0–6.25%
Qualification = an output passes all five criteria of a custom LLM rubric. It is not accuracy, human acceptance or deployment success.
Limits
- No ablations; the gain reflects the data and the training recipe together.
- The same LLM evaluator screened the training data and scored the outputs; human ratings are not reported.
- Text inputs from synthetic calls, not a live voice system.